Oriental Gold: Legend, Hypothesis, and the Scientific Mystery of a Peony

The history of cultivated plants often holds more questions than answers. Among such enigmas, the herbaceous peony Oriental Gold occupies a special place. For decades, this plant has been the subject of debate regarding its origin and still remains outside a clear phylogenetic interpretation.

According to a widely circulated version, the peony now known as Oriental Gold was discovered during the Japanese occupation of Manchuria, in the garden of the residence of the last emperor of the Qing dynasty. The plant attracted attention because of its yellow flowers — a trait unknown among herbaceous peonies of that era. Additional interest was raised by its yellow roots and buds, as well as the lemon-colored young shoots emerging in spring. These features had no known analogues among forms of Paeonia lactiflora and immediately called into question its conventional garden origin. After being transferred to Japan and later to the United States, the plant was introduced into cultivation and in 1954 was registered by A. P. Smirnov under the name Oriental Gold. From that point onward, the peony began to spread through private and botanical collections, maintaining its reputation as a botanical anomaly.

The first scientific hypothesis of origin

Doubts about the “ordinary” origin of Oriental Gold were expressed long before the advent of molecular analytical methods. In December 1997, James K. Langhammer published an article in APS Bulletin No. 304 titled “Oriental Gold may be an Ancient Peony”, in which he first proposed that this peony might be linked to an ancient or lost natural lineage. He drew attention to a unique combination of traits — yellow underground organs, yellow buds, and unusual pigmentation of young tissues — that could not be explained within the framework of known species or garden hybrids. Langhammer suggested that Oriental Gold should be regarded not as a sport or an aberrant form of P. lactiflora, but as a possible relict hybrid preserved exclusively in cultivation. This publication marked the beginning of a scientific discussion on the unusual origin of Oriental Gold.

Phylogenetic context

In the 1990s, the Chinese botanist and evolutionary biologist Tao Sang published a series of studies on the phylogeny of the genus Paeonia based on DNA analysis. His research demonstrated that many modern wild peonies are ancient natural hybrids formed through natural hybridization events millions of years ago. One of his most significant discoveries was the identification of traces of extinct evolutionary lineages preserved in the genomes of modern peonies. These lineages were designated ES1, ES2, and ES3. Reconstructions suggested that one of these extinct lineages may have possessed yellow pigmentation of both flowers and underground organs — a trait absent in extant wild species. In this context, the hypothesis of an ancient origin of Oriental Gold gains additional scientific relevance: the plant may represent a cultivated relic preserving genetic traces of extinct forms.

Current state of knowledge

To date, Oriental Gold has been included in several molecular and cytogenetic studies, primarily those aimed at developing markers for interspecific and intersectional hybrids of Paeonia. In these studies, the plant was used as a comparative reference, confirming that molecular data for this cultivar do exist. However, no targeted genetic study aimed specifically at determining the parentage and evolutionary origin of Oriental Gold has yet been conducted. Comprehensive genome sequencing, phylogenomic analyses, or direct comparisons with wild Paeonia species have not been published. Thus, despite the availability of partial molecular data, the origin of Oriental Gold remains unresolved and requires a dedicated investigation focused on reconstructing its phylogenetic relationships and possible ancient lineages.

 

The history of Oriental Gold illustrates how fragile and incomplete our understanding of plant evolution can be. Sometimes a single cultivar, preserved by chance in cultivation, becomes a living carrier of lost biological memory. Plants may preserve history no less faithfully than archives — if we learn how to read it.

Acknowledgements

The author expresses sincere gratitude to those who provided photographic materials used in this publication:
Lilia Zeynalova (Instagram: @cvetodomkg),
Tatyana Khabibulina (VK: @id433137246),
Zhanna Evdokimova (VK: @pionbotan).

If you have observations, photographs, old notes, or your own hypotheses related to Oriental Gold or similar forms, I would truly welcome a dialogue.

Sometimes it is through such conversations that the missing fragments of history are finally brought together — a history that plants may preserve better than books.
The most commonly encountered names are:
• Oriental Gold — the registered name (USA, APS, Europe)
• Huang Jin Lun (黄锦轮) — the Chinese name, literally “Golden Brocade Wheel”
• Golden Wheel / Golden Brocade Wheel — English translation names found in older catalogues and private collections
• occasionally Yellow Smirnov Peony — an informal collector’s name linked to the original registrant
It is important to understand that all these names refer to the same genotype, not different cultivars.
The variation in names reflects the historical journey of this peony through China, Japan, and the United States, as well as cataloguing practices of different periods.
0 Comments

Leave a reply

2026, The Peony Society

1 / ?

Log in with your credentials

or    

Forgot your details?

Create Account